Comparison of the effectiveness of kick and sweep hand net and Surber net sampling techniques used for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples
Keywords:aquatic macroinvertebrates, kick and sweep technique, Surber net technique, sampling efficiency
The objective of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of two widely used methods for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples: the semiquantitative kick and sweep (K&S) and quantitative Surber net (SN) techniques. Based on our data, the methods were fully comparable as regards analysis of the macroinvertebrate metrics most often used in ecological status assessment (sensitivity/tolerance parameters), while K&S was found to be more successful in the evaluation of biodiversity. Thus, both methods could be used for routine monitoring of the status of water bodies, according to the recommendation of the EU Water Framework Directive, while for research, K&S is more advanced. K&S is also more effective timewise for material collecting. SN sampling is a quantitative method and could thus be used in studies of aquatic ecosystem productivity.
Received: June 22, 2016; Revised: August 26, 2016; Accepted: September 20, 2016; Published online: September 28, 2016
How to cite this article: Tubić B, Popović N, Raković M, Petrović A, Simić V, Paunović M. Comparison of the effectiveness of kick and sweep hand net and surber net sampling techniques used for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples. Arch Biol Sci. 2017;69(2):233-8.
Birk S, Hering D. Direct comparison of assessment methods using benthic macroinvertebrates: A contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia. 2006;566(1):401-15.
Verdonschot PFM, Nijboer RC. Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516(1-3):35-54.
EC. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of te European Communities 2000; L327:1-72.
Csányi B, Paunović M. The Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community of the River Danube between Klostenburg (1942 rkm) and Calafat – Vidin (795 rkm). Acta Biol Debrecina Suppl Oecologica Hungarica. 2006;14:91-106.
Rosenberg D, Resh VH. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993. 488 p.
Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, Solimini A, de Bund W, Zampoukas N, Hering D. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic. 2012;18:31-41.
Buffagni A. A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: The AQEM Project and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy). J Limnol. 2001;60(SUPPL. 1):39-48.
García-Criado F, Trigal C. Comparison of several techniques for sampling macroinvertebrates in different habitats of a North Iberian pond. Hydrobiologia. 2005;545(1):103-15.
De Pauw N, Roels D, Fontoura AP. Use of artificial substrates for standardized sampling of macroinvertebrates in the assessment of water quality by the Belgian Biotic Index. Hydrobiologia. 1986;133(3):237-58.
Resh VH, Norris RH, Barbour MT. Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. Aust J Ecol. 1995;20:108-21.
Birk S, van Kouwen L, Willby N. Harmonising the bioassessment of large rivers in the absence of near-natural reference conditions - a case study of the Danube River. Freshw Biol. 2012;57(8):1716-32.
Resh VH, McElravy EP. Contemporary quantitative approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D, Resh VH. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993. p. 159-94.
Graf W, Csányi B, Leitner P, Paunović M, Huber T, Szekeres J, Nagy C, Borza P. Macroinvertebrates. In: Liška I, Wagner F, Sengl M, Deutch K, Slobodnik J, editors. Joint Danube Survey 3 A Comprehensive Analysis of Danube Water Quality. Vienna: International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River - ICPDR; 2015. p. 81-99.
Navarro-Ortega A, Acuña V, Bellin A, Burek P, Cassiani G, Choukr-Allah R, Dolédec S, Elosegi A, Ferrari F, Ginebreda A, Grathwohl P, Jones C, Rault PK, Kok K, Koundouri P, Ludwig RP, Merz R, Milacic R, Munoz I, Nikulin G, Paniconi C, Paunović M, Petrović M, Sabater L, Sabaterb S, Skoulikidis NT, Slob A, Teutsch G, Voulvoulis N, Barcelo D. Managing the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems under water scarcity. The GLOBAQUA project. Sci Total Environ. 2015;503:3-9.
Brumley J, Schuster J, McKone K, Evans R, Arnold M, Keatley A, Hicks L, Goodmann P. Methods for Sampling Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Wadeable Waters. Frankfort, Kentucky; 2015.
EN 27828:1994: Water quality - Methods for biological sampling - Guidance on hand-net sampling of benthic macro-invertebrates. 1994.
AQEM Consortium. Manual for the application of the Aqem system: A comprehenssive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework. Essen: University Duisburg-Essen, Germany; 2002. 198 p.
Verdonschot PFM. Micro-distribution of oligochaetes in as soft-bottomed lowland stream (Elsbeek; The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia. 1999;406:149-63.
Paunović M. Structure of macroinvertebrate communities a indicator of running water types in Serbia [dissertatuon]. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology; 2007.
Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. 10th ed. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press; 1964. 132 p.
Cummins KW, Klug MJ. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1979;10:147-72.
Zelinka M, Marvan P. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Arch Hydrobiol. 1961;(57):389-407.
Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res. 1983;17(3):333-47.
Karadžić B. FLORA: A Software Package for Statistical Analysis of Ecological Data. Water Res Manag. 2013;3(2):45-54.
Graf W, Csányi B, Leitner P, Paunovic M, Chiriac G, Stubauer I, Ofenböck T, Wagner F. Macroinvertebrates. In: Liška I, Wagner F, Slobodník J, editors. Joint Danube Survey 2 Final Scientific Report. Vienna: International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River - ICPDR; 2008. p. 41-53.
Brua RB, Culp JM, Benoy GA. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrate communities by two methods: Kick- and U-net sampling. Hydrobiologia. 2011;658(1):293-302.