Morphological and yield responses of 20 genotypes of bread wheat to drought stress


  • Ali Jamali Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan
  • Yousef Sohrabi Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan
  • Adel Siose Mardeh Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan
  • Farzad Hoseinpanahi Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan


cluster analysis, principal component analysis, RUE, bread wheat, drought stress


Paper description:

• The wheat grain filling period usually experiences drought stress in Iran.

• To study the yield of wheat grain, it is important to know which traits such as grain number and weight has a greater role in grain yield improvement. This relationship is different in different genotypes.

• Twenty genotypes of wheat were examined in the Kermanshah region in order to identify high yield genotypes.

• The quantitative traits screened herein can be used to improve grain yield of wheat genotypes in future breeding programs.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to select wheat genotypes most resistant to drought stress. The experiment was conducted at the research farms of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran, during 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. A randomized complete block design with three replicates using 20 genotypes of rain-fed wheat was applied. Cluster analysis of different wheat genotypes segregated the genotypes into 3 groups. Comparison between the groups in the first crop year revealed that the second and third groups exhibited the highest rate of radiation-use efficiency (RUE), and the first group had the lowest. Grain yield was highest in the third group and lowest in the first group, with an average of 219.87 g/m2 and 173.40 g/m2, respectively. In the second crop year, the highest rate of RUE was reported in the first group and lowest in the second and third groups. The highest grain yield was observed in the second group and the lowest in the third group (315.40 g/m2 and 253.75 g/m2, respectively). Based on the results of the biplot, high-yield genotypes in the first year of cultivation included G14 (263.00 g/m2), G20 (264.50 g/m2), G18 (214.00 g/m2) and G19 (222.50 g/m2). Based on the results obtained by cluster and PCA analysis under stress conditions, we concluded that several traits play a role in determining the grain yield of wheat.

Received: November 28, 2019; Revised: December 17, 2019; Accepted: December 18, 2019; Published online: January 9, 2020

How to cite this article: Jamali A, Sohrabi Y, Siose Mardeh A, HoseinpanahiF. Morphological and yield responses of 20 genotypes of bread wheat to drought stress. Arch Biol Sci. 2020;72(1):71-9.


Download data is not yet available.


Rana RM, Rehman SU, Ahmed J, Bilal M. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in drought stress tolerance research in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Asian J Agri Bio. 2013;1(1):29-37.

Learnmore M, Shimelis H, Dube E, Laing MD, Tsilo T. Breeding wheat for drought tolerance: Progress and technologies. J Integ Agri. 2016;15(5):935-43.

Lonbani M, Arzani A. Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal drought stress tolerance in triticale and wheat. Agro Res. 2011;9(1-2):315-29.

Vafa P, Naseri R, Mordi M. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield Components and protein content of durum wheat cultivars in Ilam Province, Iran. Int J Biol Bio-mol Agri Food Biotech Eng. 2014;8(6):631-6.

Saeidi M, Abdoli M. Effect of drought stress during grain filling on yield and its components, gas exchange variables, and some physiological traits of wheat cultivars. Agri Sci Tech. 2015;17(4):885-95.

Zhang Zh, Christensen M, Nan Zh, Whish J, Bell L, Wang J, Wang Zh, Sim R. Plant development and solar radiation interception of four annual forage plants in response to sowing date in a semi-arid environment. Ind Crop Prod. 2019;131:41-53.

Sanchez-Garcia M, Royo C, Aparicio N, Martin-Sanchez JA, Alvaro F. Genetic improvement of bread wheat yield and associated traits in Spain during the 20th century. J Agri Sci. 2013;151:105-18.

Wu W, Li C, Ma B, Shah F, Liu Y, Liao Y. Genetic progress in wheat yield and associated traits in China since 1945 and future prospects. Euphytica. 2013;196(2):155-68.

Gonzalez-Navarro OE, Griffiths S, Molero G, Reynolds MP, Slafer GA. Dynamics of floret development determining differences in spike fertility in anelite population of wheat. Field Crop Res. 2015;172:21-31.

Fischer RA. Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop Pasture Sci. 2011;62(2):95-114.

Farnia A, Tork A. Changes in yield and yield components of wheat cultivars underwater stress condition. Int J Life Sci. 2015;9(5):103-107.

Sadok W, Schoppach R, Ghanem ME, Zucca C, Sinclair TR. Wheat drought-tolerance to enhance food security in Tunisia, birthplace of the Arab Spring. Eur J Agro. 2019;107:1-9.

Gardner F, Pearce R, Mitchell RL. Physiology of crop plants. Ames: Iowa State University Press;1985. 325p.

Bange, MP, Hawwer GL, Rickert KG. Effect of leaf nitrogen on radiation use efficiency and growth of sunflower. Crop Sci. 1997;37:1201-7.

Keshavarz H, Sadegh Ghol Moghadam R. Seed priming with cobalamin (vitamin B12) provides significant protection against salinity stress in the common bean. Rhizosphere. 2016;3:143-9.

Wang JY, Xiong YC, Li FM, Siddique KH, Turner NC. Effects of drought stress on morpho-physiological traits, biochemical characteristics, yield, and yield components in different ploidy wheat: A meta-analysis. Adv Agro. 2017;143:139-73.

Abdel-Motagally FMF, El-Zohri M. Improvement of wheat yield grown under drought stress by boron foliar application at different growth stages. J Saudi Soc Agri Sci. 2018;17(2):178-85.

Nelissen H, Sun XH, Rymen B, Jikumaru Y, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, De Block J. The reduction in maize leaf growth under mild drought affects the transition between cell division and cell expansion and cannot be restored by elevated gibberellic acid levels. Plant Biotech. 2018;16(2):615-27.

Quinones C, Mattes N, Faronilo J. Jagadish KS. Drought stress reduces grain yield by altering floral meristem development and sink size under dry-seeded rice cultivation. Crop Sci. 2017;57(4):2098-108.

Fang Y, Du Y, Wang J, Wu A, Qiao S, Xu B, Chen Y. Moderate drought stress affected root growth and grain yield in old, modern and newly released cultivars of winter wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:672-80.

Polania JA, Poschenrieder C, Beebe S, Rao IM. Effective use of water and increased dry matter partitioned to grain contribute to yield of common bean improved for drought resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:660-7.

Bota J, Tomás M, Flexas J, Medrano H, Escalona JM. Differences among grapevine cultivars in their stomatal behavior and water use efficiency under progressive water stress. Agri Water Manag. 2016;16:91-9.

Zandalinas SI, Mittler R, Balfagón D, Arbona V, Gómez‐Cadenas A. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiol Plantarum. 2018;162(1):2-12.

Reynolds MP, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Sawkins M. Prospects for utilising plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinity-prone environments. Annual Appl Biol. 2005;146:239-59.

Ouyang W, Struik PC, Yin X, Yang J. Stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and transpiration efficiency in relation to leaf anatomy in rice and wheat genotypes under drought. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(18):5191-205.

Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, Sharma S. Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:161-8.

Avila R, Magalhaes PC, Alvarenga AA, Lavinsky ADO, Campos CN, Souza TC, Gomes Junior CC. Drought-tolerant maize genotypes invest in root system and maintain high harvest index during water stress. Embrapa Milho e Sorgo-Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE). 2017;15(3):450-60.

Belachew K Y, Nagel KA, Fiorani F, Stoddard FL. Diversity in root growth responses to moisture deficit in young faba bean (Vicia faba L.) plant. Peer J. 2018;6:e4401.

Atta BM, Mahmood T, Trethowan TM. Relationship between root morphology and grain yield of wheat in north-western NSW. Australia. Aust J Crop Sci. 2013;7(13):2108-13.

Kanbar A, Toorchi M, Shashidhar H. Relationship between root and yield morphological characters in rainfed low land rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cereal Res Commun. 2009;37(2):261-8.

Greaves GE, Yu-Min WANG. The effect of water stress on radiation interception, radiation use efficiency and water use efficiency of maize in a tropical climate. Turkish J Field Crop. 2017;22(1):114-25.

Adeboye OB, Schultz B, Adekalu KO, Prasad K. Impact of water stress on radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) in Nigeria. Brazilian J Sci Tech. 2016;3(1):15-24.

Sinclair TR, Muchow RC. Radiation use efficiency. Adv Agro. 1999;65:215-65.

Flexas J, Medrano H. Energy dissipation in C3 plants under drought. Func Plant Biol. 2002;29 (10):1209-15.

Medrano H, Tomás M, Martorell S, Flexas J, Hernández E, Rosselló J, Bota J. From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. Crop J. 2015;3(3):220-8.




How to Cite

Jamali A, Sohrabi Y, Siose Mardeh A, Hoseinpanahi F. Morphological and yield responses of 20 genotypes of bread wheat to drought stress. Arch Biol Sci [Internet]. 2020Mar.24 [cited 2023Nov.28];72(1):71-9. Available from: