Patterns of leaf morphological variation in Quercus frainetto Ten. growing on different soil types in Serbia
Keywords:Hungarian oak, Quercus frainetto, leaf size, leaf shape, soil type
- Foliar morphology is defined by the way plants adapt to different habitats.
- Morphological variation of leaf size and shape of the Hungarian oak (Quercus frainetto) growing on different soil types was determined.
- Individuals growing on nutrient-poor, shallow soils, had smaller leaves with greater lobation.
- The observed differences suggest that the levels of soil productivity influence different variation patterns of the leaf.
Abstract: Leaf morphology is at a certain level defined by the ways in which plants adapt to different habitats, especially in large trees. In this study, morphological variations in leaf size and shape of the Hungarian oak (Quercus frainetto Ten.) growing on different soil types (lithic leptosol, vertisol, cambisol) were investigated in the central part of Serbia (Šumadija). The information on soil type was obtained using a digitalized soil map of the Republic of Serbia, while leaf traits were characterized by geometric morphometric methods. Landmark analysis and leaf measurements showed significant differences among the analyzed groups, with individuals growing on nutrient-poor, shallow soils having smaller leaves with greater lobation. The observed differences suggest that the levels of soil productivity influence variations in leaf patterns. More studies on a larger sample size and along a broader spatial scale are needed to fully understand the differences in the patterns of leaf morphological variation in Q. frainetto.
Alcántara-Ayala O, Oyama K. Ríos-Muñoz CA, Rivas G, Ramirez-Barahona S, Luna-Vega I. Morphological variation of leaf traits in the Ternstroemia lineata species complex (Ericales: Penthaphylacaceae) in response to geographic and climatic variation. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8307.
Adamidis GC, Varsamis G, Tsiripidis I, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Papageorgiou AC. Patterns of leaf morphological traits of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an altitudinal gradient. Forests. 2021;12(10):1297.
Sisó S, Camarero J, Gil-Pelegrín E. Relationship between hydraulic resistance and leaf morphology in broadleaf Quercus species: a new interpretation of leaf lobation. Trees. 2001;15:341-45.
Xu F, Guo W, Xu W, Wei Y, Wang R. Leaf morphology correlates with water and light availability: What consequences for simple and compound leaves? Prog Nat Sci. 2009;19(12):1789-98.
Booth MS, Stark JM, Rastetter E. Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr. 2005;75(2):139-57.
Lin S, Shao L, Hui C, Sandhu HS, Fan T, Zhang L, Li F, Ding Y, Shi P. The effect of temperature on the developmental rates of seedling emergence and leaf-unfolding in two dwarf bamboo species. Trees. 2018;32(3):751-63.
Ordoñez JC, Van Bodegom PM, Witte J-PM., Wright IJ, Reich PB, Aerts R. A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2009;18(2):137-49.
Gvozdevaite A, Oliveras I, Ferreira Domingues T, Peprah T, Boakye M, Afriyie L, da Silva Peixoto K, de Farias J, de Oliveira EA, Farias CCA, dos Santos Prestes NCC, Neyret M, Moore S, Schwantes Marimon B, Marimon Junior BH, Adu-Bredu S, Malhi Y. 2018. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity dynamics in relation to soil and foliar nutrients along forest-savanna boundaries in Ghana and Brazil. Tree Physiol. 2018;38(12):1912-25.
McDonald PG, Fonseca CR, Overton JM, Westoby M. Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? Funct Ecol. 2003;17(1):50-7.
Liu W, Zheng L, Qi D. Variation in leaf traits at different altitudes reflects the adaptive strategy of plants to environmental changes. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(15):8166-75.
Nicotra AB, Leigh A, Boyce CK, Jones CS, Niklas KJ, Royer DL, Tsukaya H. The evolution and functional significance of leaf shape in the angiosperms. Funct Plant Biol. 2011;38:535-52.
Gong H, Cui Q, Gao J. Latitudinal, soil and climate effects on key leaf traits in northeastern China. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020;22:e00904.
Šijačić-Nikolić M, Nonić M, Perović M, Kerkez Janković I, Milovanović J. Conservation of forest genetic resources through the example of native Quercus species from the "Košutnjak" park forest in Serbia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;875:012002.
Nixon KC. Global and Neotropical distribution and diversity of oak (genus Quercus) and oak forests. In: Kappelle M, editor. Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Oak Forests. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 3-13. (Ecological Studies; Vol. 185).
Cavender-Bares J. 2019. Diversification, adaptation, and community assembly of the American oaks (Quercus), a model clade for integrating ecology and evolution. New Phytol. 2019;221(2):669-92.
BGCI. State of the World's Trees. Richmond, UK: BCGI; 2021.
Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, Deans JD, Fineschi S, Finkeldey R, Glaz I, Goicoechea PG, Jensen JS, König AO, Lowe AJ, Madsen SF, Mátyás G, Munro RC, Popescu F, Slade D, Tabbener H, van Dam B, de Vries SGM [SMG], Ziegenhagen B, de Beaulieu J-L, Kremer A. Identification of refugia and postglacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manag. 2002;156(1-3):49-74.
Mauri A, Enescu CM, Houston Durrant T, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. Quercus frainetto in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A. editors. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU; 2016. p. e01de78+.
Bordács S, Zhelev P, Schirone B. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Hungarian oak (Quercus frainetto). European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN), European Forest Institute; 2019; p. 1-6.
Vujadinović S, Gajić M. Floristic and vagatation diversity of Gruža. Bull Serbian Geogr Soc. 2005;85:29-36. Serbian.
Vukin, M., Rakonjac, Lj. 2013. Comparative analysis of some biological characteristics of Hungarian oak and Turkey oak. Arch Biol Sci. 2013;65(1):331-40.
Ličina V, Nešić Lj, Belić M, Hadžić V, Sekulić P, Vasin J, Ninkov J. The soils of Serbia and their degradation. Field Veg. Crop Res. 2011;48:285-90. https://doi.org/10.5937/ratpov1102285L
Maksimović J, Pivić R, Stanojković-Sebić A, Jovković M, Jaramaz D, Dinić Z. Influence of soil type on the reliability of the prediction model for bioavailability of Mn, Zn, Pb, Ni and Cu in the soils of the Republic of Serbia. Agronomy. 2021;11:141.
Pavlović P, Kostić N, Karadžić B, Mitrović M. The soils of Serbia. World Soils Book Series. Dordrecht: Springer. 2017. 225 p.
Veljović V. Vegetacija okoline Kragujevca. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Belgrade. 1967;B22:1-109.
Marković JĐ 1970. Geografske oblasti SFRJ. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva Srbije; 1970. 823 p.
Brković DL. Vascular flora of mountainous areas of northwestern Serbia and Šumadija regions - ecological phytogeographical study [dissertation]. [Belgrade]: Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade. 2015. 613 p.
Ćirić M. Pedologija. Sarajevo: Svijetlost; 1991. 311 p.
Jakšić S, Ninkov J, Milić S, Vasin J, Živanov M, Jakšić D, Komlen V. Influence of slope gradient and aspect on soil organic carbon content in the Region of Niš, Serbia. Sustainability. 2021;13:8332.
QGIS Development Team [Internet]. QGIS Geographic Information System: Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. 2022 - [cited 2022 May 5]. Available from: http://qgis.osgeo.org
Republic Geodetic Authority of Serbia [Internet]. Belgrade: Republic Geodetic Authority. 2022 - [cited 2022 May 5]. Available from: www.geoserbia.rs
Mrvić V, Antonović G, Čakmak D, Perović V, Maksimović S, Saljnikov E, Nikoloski M. Pedological and pedogeochemical map of Serbia. In: Saljnikov RE, editor. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Soil Science XIII National Congress in Soil Science, Soil - Water - Plant; 2013 September 23 - 26; Belgrade. Belgrade: Soil Science Society of Serbia Soil Science Institute; 2013.
Li Y, Zhang Y, Liao PC, Wang T, Wang X, Ueno S, Du FK. Genetic, geographic, and climatic factors jointly shape leaf morphology of an alpine oak, Quercus aquifolioides Rehder and E.H. Wilson. Ann For Sci. 2021;78:64.
Viscosi V. Geometric morphometrics and leaf phenotypic plasticity: assessing fluctuating asymmetry and allometry in European white oaks (Quercus). Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;179(2):335-48.
Rohlf FJ. The tps series of software. Hystrix. 2015;26(1):9-12.
Savriama Y. A step-by-step guide for geometric morphometrics of floral symmetry. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1433.
Klingenberg CP. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models and mechanisms. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 427-42.
Klingenberg, CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11(2):353-57.
Chuanromanee TS, Cohen JI, Ryan GL. Morphological Analysis of Size and Shape (MASS): An integrative software program for morphometric analyses of leaves. Appl Plant Sci. 2019;7(9):e11288.
Čortan D, Nonić M, Šijačić-Nikolić M. Phenotypic plasticity of European beech from international provenance trial in Serbia. In: Šijačić-Nikolić M, Milovanović J, Nonić M, editors, Forests of Southeast Europe under a changing climate: conservation of genetic resources. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019. p. 333-51.
Meier IC, Leuschner C. Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: competing effects of precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems. 2008;11:655-69.
Su Y, Renz M, Cui B, Sun X, Ouyang Z, Wang X. Leaf morphological and nutrient traits of common woody plants change along the urban-rural gradient in Beijing, China. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:682274.
Salehi M, Walthert L, Zimmermann S, Waldner P, Schmitt M, Schleppi P, Liechti K, Ahmadi M, Zahedi Amiri G, Brunner I, Thimonier A. Leaf morphological traits and leaf nutrient concentrations of European beech across a water availability gradient in Switzerland. Front For Glob Change. 2020;3:19.
Wang C, He J, Zhao TH, Cao Y, Wang G, Sun B, Yan X, Guo W, Li MH. The Smaller the Leaf Is, the Faster the Leaf Water Loses in a Temperate Forest. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:58.
Migicovsky Z, Harris ZN, Klein, LL, Li M, McDermaid A, Chitwood DH, Fennell A, Kovacs LG, Kwasniewski M, Londo JP, Ma Q, Miller AJ. Rootstock effects on scion phenotypes in a 'Chambourcin' experimental vineyard. Hortic Res. 2019;6:64.
Fritz MA, Rosa S, Sicard A. Mechanisms underlying the environmentally induced plasticity of leaf morphology. Front Genet. 2018;9:478.
Semchenko M. Zobel K. The role of leaf lobation in elongation responses to shade in the rosette-forming forb Serratula tinctoria (Asteraceae). Ann Bot. 2007;100(1):83-90.
Cornelissen T, Stiling P. Similar responses of insect herbivores to leaf fluctuating asymmetry. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2010;5(1):59-69.
Santos JC, Alves-Silva E, Cornelissen TG, Fernandes GW. The effect of fluctuating asymmetry and leaf nutrients on gall abundance and survivorship. Basic Appl Ecol. 2013;14(6):489-95.
Kusi J, Karsai I. Plastic leaf morphology in three species of Quercus: The more exposed leaves are smaller, more lobated and denser. Plant Species Biol. 2020;35(1):24-37.
Gong H, Gao J. Soil and climatic drivers of plant SLA (specific leaf area). Glob Ecol Conserv. 2019;20:e00696.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Archives of Biological Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.